" /> the adventures of dr. diana york blaine: June 2007 Archives

« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 26, 2007

Say Goodbye to Freedom

It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion. First George Bush packs the Supreme Court with religious conservatives, all of them promising us all along that they won't be making biased decisions. Then the cases start rolling in, each of them easily resolved from the standpoint of civil liberty: side with freedom, vote to support individuals, protect free speech, avoid repressive laws.

But nooooooooo. Our "fair" jurists have made it quite clear that their interpretation of the constitution falls heavily towards control. Can a high school kid say whatever he wants? No, not if it's a joke about Jesus and pot. Can a woman control her body? No, not if it's a type of abortion that some people find yucky. Can women sue for wage discrimination? No, not if their attempt falls outside of a narrow time window. Can taxpayers be protected from having their money spent to support religious indoctrination? No, not since Bush renamed their conversion attempts "charitable." Can individuals defend themselves from large corporations? No, the court has made it clear they're pro-business not pro-people.

When I say "the court," however, it is important to understand that while the majority rules, there are dissenting opinions. I want to thank Stevens, Souter and Ginsberg for believing that teenagers should not be silenced simply because their message makes people uncomfortable. The kid was standing on a public sidewalk with a banner reading "bong tokes 4 Jesus." His principal made him remove it and he sued, saying his freedom of speech was being curtailed. Obviously it was. But not so obviously if you're sitting on today's conservative Supreme Court who just ruled against him in a split decision.

The paradox is obvious: "no," the conservatives thunder, "you can't get an abortion because that's an individual in your belly!" But as soon as that "individual" is born, she begins losing all of her rights. Control children, control women, control employees, control dissenters. It's all happening right in front of our eyes.

And I will show you where we are headed. I belong to a community service organization in which some members recently tried to convince us that we should all say the Lord's Prayer at the end of our meetings. Obviously this would be inappropriate as we are not a religious organization nor are all of us Christians. But this didn't stop some people from arguing vociferously that they were being discriminated against if we did not agree to say their prayer. Seriously. Discriminated against.

One woman gave a canned speech which I am quite sure her church has devised to try and force all of us to adhere to its theology in the public sphere, where I quite happily exist without religion. She said that any time people excluded monotheism, they were imposing polytheism (!), thus oppressing the poor wretched monotheists. Sigh. The fact that it is those of us who do not profess christianity who are in the minority seems lost on people like her as their need to grab and retain power persists unabated. While they won't admit it, they are the enemies of freedom, clothing themselves as the opposite, torturing logic in the interests of imposing a religious agenda on a nation which was founded by people who worked adamantly to avoid just such a theocracy, having lived under one and endured its injustices.

And now they have the Supreme Court on their side.

June 16, 2007

Real Humans Eat Fruit

Had such and interesting conversation with students the other day about the phenomenon of internalized self loathing. As I explained it, members of an outgroup, women, people of color, gay people, often say "I don't like [members of my group]," thinking they are expressing personal preference rather than reflecting the hateful ideology of the dominant class.

We do this in order to carve out some degree of self-respect, because hearing over and over how horrible, say, women are, for example, hardly causes me as a woman to want to identify with "them." So I do the opposite, identify with men against women, in effect identifying against myself but deriving a modicum of respectability for doing so.

How do I know this? Because I myself often used to say "I don't like women." Heck, I applied to a men's college, and as a 15-year-old girl, it wasn't because I wanted to "go wild." No, I wanted to be where the power and prestige was, and as I had learned and learned well growing up, that was where the men were (and still are).

It wasn't until I read feminist theory that I realized I had internalized a sexist culture's loathing of females and what we represent. Until then I had simply sided with the patriarchy, detesting weakness, vulnerability, and passivity, all of which we connect with women. In order to believe that women are weak, vulnerable, and passive, we must pretend men are not, which is where James Bond fits in. I saw Casino Royale the other night, and watching 007 get his balls repeatedly whacked only to beg for more caused me to snort in derision. Yeah, right. With only one whack to the balls, he'd have balled like, well, a "bitch." Get the idea how we artificially separate out human characteristics, rigidly associate them with either of the two sexes, and then revile those attached to females and femininity?

Which leads me to homosexuality. One of my brilliant students who identifies as a gay man disagreed with me when I said that marginalized groups internalize prejudice, leading to self loathing, which is then expressed as hatred towards the group as a whole. He felt strongly that his dislike of "gays" as he had recently seen them literally on parade during Pride festivities was generated by "their" behavior, which he found stereotypical and damaging to the cause of civil rights.

He explained that he did not act like "they" did, that members of his fraternity wouldn't know that he was gay unless he told them. Another student added that one does not have to be "fabulous" to be gay.

"What," I queried, "is wrong with being fabulous?"

Now of course I understand the point. I am not a "typical" (straight white middle class) female either. Don't lump me in with women. Why I am strong, smart, rational, coordinated, independent, etc etc etc. Those beauty pageant queens, they must be some other brand of woman than I am. They're not strong, smart, rational, coordinated, independent, etc, are they?

Are they???

Why, of course they are, come to think of it. Competition like that requires real grit. So why on earth would they choose to behave in ways that seem so demeaning, parading around trying to get power through male attention, trying to be the Queen of the whole country or even universe?

Hmm. When I put it that way, it seems kinda obvious, doesn't it? Because they are striving to achieve in one of the limited ways that women have been traditionally been allowed to achieve. They are striving for excellence in one of the traditional ways that women have been allowed to strive for excellence: as the objects of male desire.

So why am I mad at them for doing something perfectly logical given the limited circumstances of female existence? So why aren't I pissed at the patriarchy? Why am I not mad at sexism?

I am.

And it's that exact same sexism that forces my wonderful young students to identify against their own group, those fabulous, fey, exuberant men marching in the Gay Pride Parade, and with the very institution, that heteronormative fraternity system, which makes them cringe at the sight of every fairy. Why not be pissed at the Greeks? They are the ones who say that if you don't conform to rigid norms of heterosexual masculinity then you will be stomped.

The answer, as the word "stomped" suggests, is fear. It's a lot easier to stay huddled in the protection of the dominant group's shade, why some white women stay allied with white men rather than our sisters of color; why some men of color align themselves with white men rather than their sisters of color; why some gays align themselves with the straight world rather than with their homosexual brethren. What do the non-privileged peoples have to offer in the way of protection, resources, respectability? Nada.

This is why comprehensive civil rights movements take real courage.

As to what straight white men can get out of joining us in our drive to eliminate oppression, which is another good question that came up in class this week, well let's just say that constructions of masculinity today are so limiting that if I were a straight white man I would be SCREAMING for some fabulousness. (Perhaps this accounts for that bizarre Queer Eye show, but of course it just reinforces that false us/them binary that makes it hard for gay men to construct a self they can be comfortable with. That program is more about mandatory consumption patterns than sexual identity.)

Carl's Jr has a new commercial which shows said straight white male gulping down cocktails and chomping on the fruit that comes in his drink while clearly ogling "babes." The point of the ad is that "real" men cannot, do not, will not, don't, eat "fruit" (funny coincidence this is a derogatory term for gays) unless it comes lassoed to liquor.

If I were a "real" man I would be livid. How dare they try to peddle death, which is what you're asking for if you regularly consume that garbage, under the guise of masculinity? How dare they discourage "real" men from enjoying the foods that real men have been eating for millenia? And it's not just Carl's Jr. that discourages male self-preservation. Mitchum deodorant packaging actually anoints you a Mitchum man "if you don't go to the doctor until it's broken" or "if you consider mowing your lawn as cardio."

So here's my wonderful brilliant gay male students being pressured to identify with that sick world, one that pretends to represent power but actually encourages weakness, denial and death. So here's my wonderful brilliant straight male students being pressured to identify with that sick world, one that pretends to represent power but actually encourages weakness, denial and death.

Given these two options, I'd choose fabulous in a heartbeat. And proudly act to keep that heart healthy, eating fruit and getting lots of true exercise.

It's called self-love. And we could use a whole lot more of it in this supposedly self-centered society where we're all supposed to emulate and pander to this most life-denying, soul-sucking, toxic construction of straight white masculinity. No thanks.

June 14, 2007

Giving Death its Due

Grief has been kicking my butt this week. My mom died on June 11, 1997, and ten years later I find myself utterly transformed by the power that this anniversary has on my ability to function normally.

I didn't even realize what was happening. Monday, the day itself, I drove down to see my mom's sister in Laguna. She's just lost her husband of over 60 years and had to relocate to a more user-friendly senior center, a nice place where sometimes there's not quite enough room in the hallway for everyone to pass by easily with his walker. Driving down there, I reflected upon when my grandmother relocated from Encino to Leisure World in 1977. She was terminally ill with pancreatic cancer, and the move was in order for her to die. Or at least that was my youthful comprehension of the event.

So as I got off the 5 freeway I reminded myself that this was a powerful journey I was making and that I needed to give myself space to feel. I have had to learn to do this, feel that is, because I come from a family and from a culture that tends to do everything else but. Feel, that is. Instead I learned to "use" when I was uncomfortable, whether food, shopping, people, substances, or, when nothing else was available, plain old delusional thinking. "This isn't happening," I can tell myself. "I am not feeling this." "They didn't mean that." "I don't mind this."

How else can assure we are living in the Happiest Place on Earth?

The other day an affable young fellow came over to fix my stove. He and I chatted about cars and houses and, oh stoves, too, of course. When he left, I mentioned to my husband how much I had enjoyed talking with him and how nice he seemed. Wise spouse replied that the man was a classic American, friendly, gregarious, familiar. "The English would hate it," he added.

I felt a stab of shame. Now first of all what's lovely today is that I am actually aware of what I am feeling. I used to plunge through life unconsciously, asking my poor body to take the psychic blows I was too vulnerable--in my fantasized invulnerability--to process. It's not like that today. Instead I noticed the shame, felt it, and then asked myself why it was there. I realized I have always felt inferior to the Brits, who with their "stiff upper lip" have made a virtue of repression.

Why is repression a virtue? I don't have to be ashamed of the American thirst for openness and honesty. What a refreshing realization! I like it this way, not having to feel that shame all the time, the one that keeps us repressed.

And yet, it occurs to me, that the same America which touts openness and honesty is also the same America into which I was socialized not to feel. It is also the same America which has stopped mourning death, eliminating almost every visible aspect of grief from our cultural scene, expects people to "get over it" by the time the funeral draws to a close.

After all, "she's in a better place."

No phrase could be more perfectly designed to force one to stuff her grief. How dare I feel bad that mom's dead if she's tripping the light fantastic somewhere in the sky? What's my problem?

Well first of all, I have absolutely no idea where my mother is, except for the certainty that her corpse lies in Oak Park Cemetery in Claremont. Pop's ashes do too, I might add. As to the rest of the, oh I want to say blarney, about heaven and such, well, suffice to say I just don't know what happens after we die, but I am not strongly compelled to believe any of the accounts that humans have come up with, religious or otherwise.

So I have had to fight for the right to grieve, battling both personal predilection, familial indoctrination, cultural theology and social ideology. Yep, that requires real mettle, taking all of those on. And every bit of it has been worth it, for when I look around at the alternatives, I see compulsive consumption--of food, material goods, relationships, and worry. Don't want to be like that any more. Life is too short and too beautiful.

And I have made progress. While we were sitting in the dining room of her assisted living apartment, Posy asked me when my mother--her sister--died. "1997," I replied. "June 24, 1997." Then I thought to myself, why, no, it was dad who died on May 24th of last year. Mom's death day must be the 21st or..... I dropped it, suddenly unable to recall a date stamped on my soul, the day my mother died, the day my best friend died, the day my biggest champion died, the day one of the coolest people I have ever met died.

After I got home I watched a Doctor Phil about obesity. As usual he was berating someone for being sick, in this case a 500 lb young woman who uses food to medicate her desire for love and acceptance. Of course the bigger she gets, the less acceptance she gets, particularly from her mom, who was sitting there angry as she has been ever since the kid got fat in junior high and came home crying and ashamed. Suck it up, her mom tells her. Harden up. Tough it out.

Man could I relate. I too could not get full that Monday. I too ate things I did not need for their nutritional value or energy contribution both at the Senior dining hall and then when I got home. Cookies, nuts, almond butter, where's the cheese? I could see myself doing it, but did not know why. Instead of remembering that I had been taught to stuff feelings and something was clearly going on, I found myself starting to drown in self-loathing. Why can't I exert control over self? Why can't I be thin and beautiful? Only then will everyone love me and I won't have to feel this pain.

Old tapes.

Fortunately just then my wonderful husband came home from the store. I told him how I was feeling, said I was trapped by food, starving and yet already having heartburn from one macadamia nut too many. Maybe it's because I went and saw Posy, I wondered aloud, knowing that seeing her in her new apartment was also seeing her closer to the end of her life.

Marty said "Well you know today's the day your mother died."

oh.

How amazing that I could not face this fact alone. How gentle is my universal guide, giving me people in my life to help me face things I cannot face alone. How wonderful is my progress which will never be perfect but is good enough today that I can eventually face what I need to face and so don't have to walk around filled with toxic waste! Beautiful.

I'm tearing up writing this, still filled with feelings, I want to say "all these days later," when really it's "all these years later." Monday I got to feel, gave myself permission to still be sad, to still miss mom, even a decade after her demise. Later that night, after communing with lovely friends who cemented my right to grieve rather than telling me to suck it up, I got out the funeral program and obit to put on my altar; seeing these two artifacts opened a stunning floodgate of emotion. I sobbed and sobbed and sobbed and sobbed, sitting there on the floor of my bedroom, clutching the little stuffed, er, thing, that I made for my mom when I was a little girl and she kept the entire rest of her life in a drawer right beside her bed.

The tears rolling down my face were so big and hot that I wondered if they came from a different place than usual. My cries were so anguished I wondered if the neighbors could hear. But I didn't care. My mom's dead. I love her. That hurts. It should.

The next day I went to teach my Feminist Theory class feeling like I had run a marathon the day before. In effect I had, getting to the most painful emotional place humans go, full blown acceptance of loss. I knew from previous experience that I would be compromised, so I treated myself gently. I shared what I was going through with my class, told them I was not operating on full steam. No more stiff upper lips for me. I am human, vulnerable, imperfect, emotional.

And I loved my mommy.