Your blog is fantastic and I'm lovin' it. Thank you for sharing.

It's for you, babe. For some reason people who aren't interested in our path are spending their precious power trying to shame us. I don't care. I write for men and women like us who want a new way, a new pair of glasses, yes? I thank the universe for you and your support. It reminds me why I do this.

You are a twit. Your blog is insipid.

See above for excellent example! Who would I rather be? Not a real hard choice, is it?

Gut Seite! Sehr gut! Danke schoen fuer Information!

Dr. Di - It's not "who you would rather be" but what your opinions and positions on issues are. Why do you feel all males are complicit in a single act of rape? How can you be an advocate and an academic at the same time?

I'm not questioning you - I'm questioning your worldview. It's not personal - it's an honest academic inquiry. It is independent of how you perceive yourself or your self worth.

Chairman, she can hear you, she's not listening to you.

It seems with Dr. Di, everything is personal. She is a university professor! How dare you question her advocacy and academia.

Sadly Scott, I know you are right.

As far as I can tell from her posts and letters, Dr. Blaine's job is essentially to generate hypotheses (without stating their philosophical or ethical premises) and then cherry pick observations from pop culture that support her arguments. It essentially takes the same mental rigor as a racist using examples of minorities committing crimes to justify his or her world view - it's easy to find observations that fit your story, but correlation does not equal causation, and the counter examples are significant, but always ignored. Apparently, for Dr. Blaine it is easier to make the world’s problems into a struggle of men vs. women, whites vs. minorities, rich vs. poor because it fits her simplistic polarized view of reality and it is easier to write a book, paper or lecture about. In this way, she's no different than Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly - making a living off of the polarization of the world. There are many victims and perpetrators of injustice in this world - on that I think we can all agree. But Dr. Blaine’s insistence on making everyone either a victim or a perpetrator and then assigning blame based on their chromosomes, skin color, country of birth, perceived privilege etc., rather than on their INDIVIDUAL beliefs and actions, takes us further from a world where everyone can be free to be their “radical wonderful selves”, not closer to it. It is for that reason that I spend the time to be critical of her words.

Thanks for inviting us to repost this--I've done just that.

ciao! buon lavoro, gradisco il vostro luogo:) grazie

non potrei trovare le informazioni I state necessarie. Ora le ho, ringraziamenti..)

Luogo che bene informato e piacevole avete!!))

dear Quill,

You wrote:
''Apparently, for Dr. Blaine it is easier to make the world’s problems into a struggle of men vs. women, whites vs. minorities, rich vs. poor because it fits her simplistic polarized view of reality''

isnt she saying exact the opposite?? i quote:

I do not want to see men and women as natural enemies or opposites. I do not want to belittle and silence my enemies. I do not want to have only specious arguments about the allegedly specious nature of my arguments to offer as argument. I do not want to let fear disguised as anger motivate me to react defensively.

and where did you read she was writing about all the problems in the world?

I have learned that the wonderful thing about the US(and the internet for that matter) is that everyone is free to express their own opinions, and moreover everyone is entitled to dissagree. However I feel ashamed when I hear or read someone shooting down someones beliefes with a simple insult. I don't know how Dr. Blaine feels but I beleive critisism should be welcome but only if it is constructive. I personally don't agree with her on all issues but I respect her beleifs and opinions.

Dr. Blaine,

After having spent the majority of a lazy day reading your articles and posts, I am struck by how spiritual the tone of your discourse is.

It is to the shame of established religions that conviction like yours only seems to sprout in avant-garde ideologies like feminism. Your attitude, beliefs, self-image, and sheer love of life and death would literally move the world if you were an old-timey evangelist.

That probably isn't the sort of compliment you are really looking for. I am a religious person, something of a non-PC thing these days. I am simultaneously impressed by your views and saddened by your stated aversion to religion. By that I do not mean that you need religion, . . . I think religion needs more people like you.

Luke

Luogo molto buon:) Buona fortuna!

Luogo interessante, buon disegno, lo gradisco, signore! =)

luogo piacevole! Significo quello!

luogo interessante, soddisfare interessante, buon!

Molto molto impressionato sono! Lavoro grande, yeah! [URL]http://www.ligabue.jeunespourleoui.org[/URL]